What this criterion covers exactly
Here we talk about a criterion that often makes a difference in an audit.
**AA1 — Video Transcription and Chaptering** (Chapter 24 - Multimodal Content): Published YouTube transcriptions and timestamps
Here we talk about a criterion that often makes a difference in an audit.
The **AA1 — Video Transcription and Chaptering** criterion is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to check and correct it — with a concrete example.
Here we talk about a criterion that often makes a difference in an audit.
**AA1 — Video Transcription and Chaptering** (Chapter 24 - Multimodal Content): Published YouTube transcriptions and timestamps
Why it matters: it’s a UX point that ends up translating into SEO. When poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or loss of performance on CTR.
On sites generated in volume, this criterion also serves as a **safeguard**: a stable rule avoids 1,000 errors at once.
Approach: browser-side control (rendering + code). Recommended tool: **Your WG Analyzer**.
Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the correction.
Strategy: correct + add a safeguard for bulk import.
Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console over 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexation).
Example (illustrative):
Trying to “optimize” by adding too many keywords, which degrades readability and creates repetitions.
For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g., Screaming Frog) + a targeted check in Your WG Analyzer is generally the fastest combo.
Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) + add an automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.
Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.