What exactly this criterion covers
This criterion seems “simple”, but it causes many discrepancies in production.
**M2 — High Fact Density** (Chapter 14 - GEO & AEO): High ratio of verifiable facts per paragraph, +40% AI visibility
This criterion seems “simple”, but it causes many discrepancies in production.
The **M2 — High Fact Density** criterion is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to verify and fix it — with a concrete example.
This criterion seems “simple”, but it causes many discrepancies in production.
**M2 — High Fact Density** (Chapter 14 - GEO & AEO): High ratio of verifiable facts per paragraph, +40% AI visibility
Why it matters: it is a safeguard against duplicate / cannibalization. When poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or performance loss on Core Web Vitals.
On high-volume generated sites, this criterion also serves as a **safeguard**: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.
Approach: check in crawl (list + export). Recommended tool: **Google Search Console**.
Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the fix.
Strategy: fix + add a safeguard for bulk import.
Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).
Example (illustrative):
Applying an automatic pattern that is too generic (same logic on all pages) without adding a differentiating element.
For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g. Screaming Frog) + targeted verification in Google Search Console is generally the fastest combo.
Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) + add automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.
Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.