معيار p8-chapitres-video-timestamps : Video chapters timestamps — دليل + قائمة تحقق

Why it matters: it’s a technical quality factor (crawl, rendering, indexing). When it is poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (bad associated query), duplication between pages, or loss of performance on Core Web Vitals.

On sites generated in volume, this criterion also serves as a **safeguard**: a stable rule avoids 1,000 errors at once.

Approach: validation via Search Console (real data). Recommended tool: **AnswerThePublic**.

1. Open the source code and locate the element concerned (tag/structure).
2. Controls hierarchy and consistency with H1 + intro.
3. Run a crawl to detect pages that violate the criterion.

Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the correction.

Strategy: Apply a rule, then check neighboring pages.

• Rewrite the plan: H1 clear, H2 = sub-questions, H3 = details.
• Adds a differentiating element (scope, method, example) to avoid duplication.
• Checks consistency with the intention (info / comparison / action).

Next: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console over 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).

Example (illustrative):

• **Context**: blog article for law firm in Nice
• **Before**: generic H1 + sections without hierarchy (inconsistent H2/H3).
• **After**: H1 intention-oriented + H2 by sub-questions (case: blog article — law firm).
• **Note**: Objective: make the plan “scannable” and aligned with intent.

• [ ] Meets the intent
• [ ] Respects: key moments google
• [ ] Single
• [ ] Concrete examples
• [ ] Natural keywords