What exactly this criterion covers
This criterion seems “simple,” but it causes many discrepancies in production.
**AB2 — Fact Sources Verification** (Chapter 25 - GEO Audit): Each claim supported by a reliable source
This criterion seems “simple,” but it causes many discrepancies in production.
The criterion **AB2 — Fact Sources Verification** is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to verify and correct it — with a concrete example.
This criterion seems “simple,” but it causes many discrepancies in production.
**AB2 — Fact Sources Verification** (Chapter 25 - GEO Audit): Each claim supported by a reliable source
Why it matters: it is a signal of understanding for the engine. When poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or performance loss on bounce rate.
On high-volume generated sites, this criterion also serves as a **safeguard**: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.
Approach: browser-side control (render + code). Recommended tool: **Schema Organization/Person**.
Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the correction.
Strategy: correct the minimum necessary, then stabilize.
Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).
Example (illustrative):
Correcting a single page without fixing the template/import: the error returns at the next generation.
For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g. Screaming Frog) + targeted verification in Schema Organization/Person is generally the fastest combo.
Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) + add an automatic check (crawl or test) before production import.
Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.