H3 — Chapter 8 - Images

Criterion H3 : Image Compression — guide + checklist

PART 1 - Fundamentals Chapter 8 - Images Keyword : compression images

This is typically the kind of detail that avoids conflicting signals.

The **H3 — Image Compression** criterion is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to check and fix it — with a concrete example.

What exactly this criterion covers

This is typically the kind of detail that avoids conflicting signals.

**H3 — Image Compression** (Chapter 8 - Images): Optimize weight without visible quality loss, tools: TinyPNG, Squoosh

Why it matters (SEO + UX)

Why it matters: it’s a lever for CTR and perception in SERP. When poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or loss of impression performance.

On volume-generated sites, this criterion also serves as a **safeguard**: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.

How to check (step by step)

Approach: express audit (manual + 1 tool). Recommended tool: **Squoosh**.

  1. Open the page in Chrome → DevTools → Performance/Network tab.
  2. Run Lighthouse and note the main weak point.
  3. Check if the problem repeats on “money” pages.

Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the fix.

How to fix properly

Strategy: apply a rule, then check neighboring pages.

  • Convert to WebP/AVIF + compress (Squoosh/ImageOptim).
  • Add width/height to avoid CLS.
  • Write a contextual alt (useful, not keyword-stuffed).

Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).

Concrete example (illustrative)

Example (illustrative):

  • **Context**: training page for sports coaching in Tunis
  • **Before**: PNG images 2–4 MB, no explicit dimensions.
  • **After**: WebP/AVIF conversion + dimensions + descriptive alt (context: training page).
  • **Note**: Goal: reduce weight and improve rendering (and sometimes image search).

Checklist to tick

  • [ ] Optimized weight
  • [ ] Respects: tools: tinypng
  • [ ] Modern format
  • [ ] Defined dimensions
  • [ ] Useful and contextual alt
FAQ

Frequently asked questions — H3

What is the most frequent error on “Image Compression”?

Applying an automatic pattern too generic (same logic on all pages) without adding a differentiating element.

Which tool is fastest for large-scale checking?

For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g., Screaming Frog) + targeted verification in Squoosh is generally the fastest combo.

How to prevent this from recurring on 10K generated pages?

Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) + add automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.

Ready to go from theory to action?

Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.

Audit with the tool → Learn in the Academy →