I11 — Chapter 9 - E-E-A-T

Criterion I11: YMYL extra prudence — guide + checklist

PART 1 - Fundamentals Chapter 9 - E-E-A-T Keyword : ymyl extra prudence

Here we discuss a criterion that often makes the difference in audits.

Criterion I11 — YMYL extra prudence is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a practical method to verify and correct it — with a concrete example.

What exactly this criterion covers

Here we discuss a criterion that often makes the difference in audits.

I11 — YMYL extra prudence (Chapter 9 - E-E-A-T): Your Money Your Life: health, finance = mandatory reinforced E-E-A-T

Why it matters (SEO + UX)

Why it matters: it is a UX point that eventually translates into SEO. When poorly applied, common issues include ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or performance loss on Core Web Vitals.

On volume-generated sites, this criterion also acts as a safeguard: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.

How to verify (step by step)

Approach: browser-side control (render + code). Recommended tool: Search Console.

  1. Check for the expected signals on the page (author, evidence, NAP, sources).
  2. Verify consistency across the entire site (same rules everywhere).
  3. Measure via Search Console (indexing, queries, linked pages) if applicable.

Tip: first isolate 10 representative URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the correction.

How to correct properly

Strategy: apply a rule, then check neighboring pages.

  • Add a real author (or “Published by …”) + profile page.
  • Add 1–3 reliable external sources when stating a fact.
  • Update the page when content changes (date if relevant).

Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).

Concrete example (illustrative)

Example (illustrative):

  • Context: local page for SEO training in Nice
  • Before: No evidence: missing author, absent sources, “anonymous” page.
  • After: Author + “About” page + external sources + update date (if relevant).
  • Note: Goal: credibility + user trust.

Checklist to tick

  • [ ] Clear author/editor
  • [ ] Respects: finance = e
  • [ ] Sources when necessary
  • [ ] Contact/About accessible
  • [ ] Consistent updates
FAQ

Frequently asked questions — I11

What is the most common mistake on “YMYL extra prudence”?

Correcting an isolated page without fixing the template/import: the error returns in the next generation.

Which tool is the fastest for large-scale control?

For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g., Screaming Frog) plus targeted verification in Search Console is generally the fastest combo.

How to prevent this from recurring on 10K generated pages?

Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) plus add automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.

Ready to go from theory to action?

Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.

Audit with the tool → Learn in the Academy →