L10 — Chapter 12 - UX & Accessibilité

Criterion L10 : Visible progression — guide + checklist

PART 1 - Fundamentals Chapter 12 - UX & Accessibilité Keyword : progression visible

Here we talk about a criterion that often makes a difference in audits.

The **L10 — Visible progression** criterion is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to check and fix it — with a concrete example.

What exactly this criterion covers

Here we talk about a criterion that often makes a difference in audits.

**L10 — Visible progression** (Chapter 12 - UX & Accessibility): Progress indicators in multi-step processes

Why it matters (SEO + UX)

Why it matters: it is a technical quality factor (crawl, rendering, indexing). When poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or loss of performance on Core Web Vitals.

On high-volume generated sites, this criterion also acts as a **safeguard**: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.

How to check (step by step)

Approach: express audit (manual + 1 tool). Recommended tool: **Chrome UX Report (CrUX)**.

  1. Open the page in Chrome → DevTools → Performance/Network tab.
  2. Run WebPageTest and note the main weak point.
  3. Check if the problem repeats on mass-generated pages.

Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the fix.

How to fix properly

Strategy: repair, re-crawl, and monitor in Search Console.

  • Simplify the mobile journey (visible menu/CTA, no aggressive popups).
  • Fix instabilities (CLS) and interactivity (INP) if affected.
  • Test on 2–3 screen sizes and re-measure.

Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).

Concrete example (illustrative)

Example (illustrative):

  • **Context**: service landing page for dentist in Lille
  • **Before**: Confusing mobile menu + hidden CTA + visible CLS.
  • **After**: Simplified navigation + visible CTA + visual stability.
  • **Note**: Goal: readability + engagement (which indirectly helps SEO).

Checklist to tick

  • [ ] Mobile first
  • [ ] Respects: steps
  • [ ] CTA visible
  • [ ] No major friction
  • [ ] Visual stability OK
FAQ

Frequently asked questions — L10

What is the most common mistake on “Visible progression”?

Applying an automatic pattern too generic (same logic on all pages) without adding a differentiating element.

What is the fastest tool to check at scale?

For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g., Screaming Frog) + targeted verification in Chrome UX Report (CrUX) is generally the fastest combo.

How to prevent this from recurring on 10K generated pages?

Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) + add automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.

Ready to go from theory to action?

Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.

Audit with the tool → Learn in the Academy →