What exactly this criterion covers
This is typically the kind of detail that prevents conflicting signals.
**L20 — ARIA landmarks** (Chapter 12 - UX & Accessibility): role=main, role=navigation, role=banner for structure
This is typically the kind of detail that prevents conflicting signals.
The **L20 — ARIA landmarks** criterion is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to check and fix it — with a concrete example.
This is typically the kind of detail that prevents conflicting signals.
**L20 — ARIA landmarks** (Chapter 12 - UX & Accessibility): role=main, role=navigation, role=banner for structure
Why it matters: it is a UX point that eventually translates into SEO. When poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or performance loss on bounce rate.
On high-volume generated sites, this criterion also acts as a **safeguard**: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.
Approach: express audit (manual + 1 tool). Recommended tool: **Hotjar/Clarity (if available)**.
Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the fix.
Strategy: fix + add a safeguard for mass import.
Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).
Example (illustrative):
Fixing an isolated page without fixing the template/import: the error returns on the next generation.
For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g., Screaming Frog) plus targeted verification in Hotjar/Clarity (if available) is generally the fastest combo.
Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) plus add automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.
Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.