M11 — Chapter 14 - GEO & AEO

Criterion M11: Content in Chunks — guide + checklist

PART 2 - Advanced Strategies Chapter 14 - GEO & AEO Keyword : contenu en chunks

This criterion seems “simple”, but it creates many discrepancies in production.

The **M11 — Content in Chunks** criterion is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to check and fix it — with a concrete example.

What exactly this criterion covers

This criterion seems “simple”, but it creates many discrepancies in production.

**M11 — Content in Chunks** (Chapter 14 - GEO & AEO): Paragraphs of 60-120 words for optimal RAG extraction

Why it matters (SEO + UX)

Why it matters: it is a UX point that eventually translates into SEO. When poorly applied, we often observe: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or loss of impression performance.

On high-volume generated sites, this criterion also acts as a **safeguard**: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.

How to check (step by step)

Approach: browser-side control (render + code). Recommended tool: **People Also Ask**.

  1. Open the source code and locate the concerned element (tag/structure).
  2. Check hierarchy and coherence with H1 + intro.
  3. Run a crawl to detect pages violating the criterion.

Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the fix.

How to fix properly

Strategy: fix the minimum necessary, then stabilize.

  • Rewrite the plan: clear H1, H2 = sub-questions, H3 = details.
  • Add a differentiating element (scope, method, example) to avoid duplication.
  • Check coherence with intent (info / comparison / action).

Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console over 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).

Concrete example (illustrative)

Example (illustrative):

  • **Context**: service landing page for sports coaching in Nice
  • **Before**: generic H1 + sections without hierarchy (incoherent H2/H3).
  • **After**: intent-oriented H1 + H2 by sub-questions (case: service landing — sports coaching).
  • **Note**: Goal: make the plan “scannable” and aligned with intent.

Checklist to tick

  • [ ] Matches intent
  • [ ] Respects: paragraphs 60
  • [ ] Unique
  • [ ] Concrete examples
  • [ ] Natural keywords
FAQ

Frequently asked questions — M11

What is the most common mistake on “Content in Chunks”?

Fixing an isolated page without correcting the template/import: the mistake returns in the next generation.

Which tool is fastest for large-scale checking?

For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g., Screaming Frog) + targeted verification in People Also Ask is generally the fastest combo.

How to prevent this from recurring on 10K generated pages?

Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) + add automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.

Ready to go from theory to action?

Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.

Audit with the tool → Learn in the Academy →