What exactly this criterion covers
This criterion is subtle… until it blocks SEO performance.
**M15 — Follow-up questions** (Chapter 14 - GEO & AEO): Anticipate and answer likely follow-up questions
This criterion is subtle… until it blocks SEO performance.
The **M15 — Follow-up questions** criterion is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to check and fix it — with a concrete example.
This criterion is subtle… until it blocks SEO performance.
**M15 — Follow-up questions** (Chapter 14 - GEO & AEO): Anticipate and answer likely follow-up questions
Why it counts: it’s a safeguard against duplicate content / cannibalization. When poorly applied, common issues include: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or loss of performance on indexing rate.
On volume-generated sites, this criterion also acts as a **safeguard**: a stable rule prevents 1,000 errors at once.
Approach: quick audit (manual + 1 tool). Recommended tool: **Google Trends**.
Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the fix.
Strategy: repair, re-crawl, and monitor in Search Console.
Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).
Example (illustrative):
Fixing an isolated page without fixing the template/import: the error returns in the next generation.
For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g., Screaming Frog) + targeted verification in Google Trends is generally the fastest combo.
Freeze an auto-generation rule (title/structure/schema/URLs) + add automatic control (crawl or test) before production import.
Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.