S9 — Chapter 20 - SEO International

Criterion S9 : Local Backlinks — guide + checklist

PART 2 - Advanced Strategies Chapter 20 - SEO International Keyword : backlinks locaux

This is often seen as an error on mass-generated sites.

The criterion **S9 — Local Backlinks** is part of our SEO checklist (335 criteria). Here, you have a **practical** method to verify and fix it — with a concrete example.

What exactly this criterion covers

This is often seen as an error on mass-generated sites.

**S9 — Local Backlinks** (Chapter 20 - International SEO): Links from target country sites

Why it’s important (SEO + UX)

Why it matters: it’s a technical quality factor (crawl, rendering, indexing). When poorly applied, issues often observed include: ambiguity (wrong associated query), duplication between pages, or performance loss on CTR.

On volume-generated sites, this criterion also serves as a **safeguard**: a stable rule avoids 1,000 errors at once.

How to verify (step by step)

Approach: check during crawl (list + export). Recommended tool: **Google Trends**.

  1. Open the source code and locate the concerned element (tag/structure).
  2. Check hierarchy and coherence with H1 + intro.
  3. Run a crawl to detect pages violating the criterion.

Tip: first isolate 10 “representative” URLs (top pages + generated pages) before scaling the correction.

How to properly fix it

Strategy: repair, re-crawl, and monitor in Search Console.

  • Rewrite the outline: clear H1, H2 = sub-questions, H3 = details.
  • Add a differentiating element (scope, method, example) to avoid duplication.
  • Check coherence with intent (info / comparison / action).

Then: re-crawl 50–200 URLs, then monitor Search Console for 7–14 days (impressions/CTR/indexing).

Concrete example (illustrative)

Example (illustrative):

  • **Context**: service landing page for a plumber in Casablanca
  • **Before**: generic H1 + sections without hierarchy (incoherent H2/H3).
  • **After**: intent-oriented H1 + H2 by sub-questions (case: service landing — plumber).
  • **Note**: Objective: make the outline “scannable” and aligned with intent.

Checklist to tick off

  • [ ] Matches intent
  • [ ] Respects: links from target country sites
  • [ ] Unique
  • [ ] Concrete examples
  • [ ] Natural keywords
FAQ

Frequently asked questions — S9

What is the most common error regarding “Local Backlinks”?

Applying an overly generic automatic pattern (same logic on all pages) without adding a differentiating element.

What is the fastest tool for large scale checking?

For this type of criterion, a crawl (e.g. Screaming Frog) plus targeted verification in Google Trends is generally the fastest combo.

How to prevent this from happening again on 10K generated pages?

Freeze a rule for auto-generation (title/structure/schema/URLs) plus add automatic control (crawl or test) before import into production.

Ready to go from theory to action?

Validate this criterion with an audit, then deepen the method in the Academy.

Audit with the tool → Learn in the Academy →